A stop-loss closes a position once price reaches a level the trader chose in advance to cap the loss; a take-profit does the same on the upside, locking in a gain at a predetermined level. Both are voluntary exits set by the trader, which makes them fundamentally different from liquidation, an involuntary exit forced by the venue once margin runs out. Setting both before a position is even opened turns the exit into a decision made with a clear head.
A stop-loss defines the maximum acceptable loss on a trade before it's opened, and once price reaches that level, the position closes regardless of whether the trader is watching. A take-profit works the same way on the favorable side, closing the position once a target gain is reached and removing the decision from the moment, when the temptation to hold for more, or to second-guess an already-set plan, is strongest. Together they define the full range of outcomes a trade is allowed to have before it needs a fresh decision.
Every leveraged position already has a liquidation price set by the venue's margin engine, the point at which the position closes involuntarily and a liquidation fee is charged on top of the loss. A voluntary stop should sit meaningfully closer to entry than that liquidation price, leaving room for ordinary volatility to happen without triggering an early exit, but still closing the position well before it reaches the point of forced liquidation. A stop placed too close to the liquidation price defeats its own purpose, since normal price noise can trigger it almost as easily as a genuine adverse move would trigger liquidation itself.
A take-profit level is often set using a risk-reward ratio relative to the stop-loss distance already chosen, for example targeting a gain twice the size of the loss the stop allows. This keeps the two exits connected to the same underlying risk decision. A take-profit set without reference to the stop distance can end up asking for a move so small that fees eat a large share of the gain, or so large that it's rarely reached before the trade reverses.
A fixed stop sets the exit at a specific price or a specific percentage away from entry, chosen for simplicity and predictability. A volatility-based stop instead sizes the distance to the asset's recent price behavior, wider on a market that regularly swings several percent in a session, tighter on one that typically moves in narrow ranges. Using the same fixed percentage stop across very different assets tends to place it too tight on volatile markets, where it gets triggered by ordinary noise, and too loose on calmer ones, where it risks far more than the setup actually calls for. Sizing the stop to the asset's own typical range generally produces a more consistent outcome across different markets.
A trailing stop adjusts as price moves in the position's favor, locking in a portion of unrealized gains. This trades away some upside, since the trailing stop can trigger before the original target, in exchange for protecting gains already made if the trade reverses earlier than expected.
The trail distance matters as much as the decision to use one at all. A trail set too tight behaves like a hair-trigger exit on a market with any normal back-and-forth movement, closing the position on a minor pullback well before the larger favorable move plays out. A trail set too wide gives back most of the benefit it was meant to provide, allowing a large share of unrealized gains to disappear before it finally triggers. The right distance generally scales with the same volatility measure that informs the initial stop, not with a fixed percentage applied regardless of how the specific asset tends to move.
A position waiting to reach a distant take-profit level accrues costs the whole time it's open. Funding settles hourly, and Canborsa's fixed benchmark for that ongoing holding cost runs at 10% annualized, while the 0.14% round-trip fee applies once the position closes regardless of how it closes, at the stop, at the target, or manually. On a $5,000 notional position held two weeks while waiting for a target to be reached, that adds up to roughly $19 in holding cost on top of the $7 round-trip fee, a real deduction from whatever gain the take-profit level was set to capture.
A stop-loss is a predetermined price level at which a position closes to cap the loss, set by the trader before or shortly after opening the position. It is a voluntary exit, distinct from the involuntary exit that liquidation triggers.
A take-profit is a predetermined price level at which a position closes to lock in a gain. It is usually set using a risk-reward ratio relative to the stop-loss distance, so the two exits are chosen together.
A sound exit strategy sets both a stop-loss and a take-profit before the trade is opened, places the stop with meaningful room before the liquidation price, and accounts for the funding and fees that accrue while the position waits to reach its target.
Perpetual markets for stocks, gold, indices and pre-IPO names — settled on-chain, no wallet-to-exchange transfers.
